🔗 Share this article

Opponents have charged the German chancellor, Friedrich Merz, of using what is described as “dangerous” language on immigration, after he advocated for “very large scale” expulsions of persons from urban areas – and asserted that parents of girls would endorse his viewpoint.

Firm Response

Merz, who assumed power in May promising to address the rise of the right-wing AfD party, on Monday reprimanded a journalist who inquired whether he intended to modify his strict statements on immigration from the previous week considering broad condemnation, or apologise for them.

“I don’t know if you have offspring, and girls among them,” Merz said to the journalist. “Consult your girls, I suspect you’ll get a pretty loud and clear reply. There is nothing to take back; to the contrary I stress: it is necessary to alter certain things.”

Political Reaction

Left-wing parties accused Merz of borrowing tactics from far-right organizations, whose allegations that females are being victimized by immigrants with assault has become a international right-wing mantra.

Green party politician Ricarda Lang, charged that Merz of promoting a dismissive comment for young women that ignored their actual political concerns.

“Maybe ‘the daughters’ are also displeased with Merz showing concern about their freedoms and protection when he can employ them to justify his entirely backward-looking policies?” she posted on X.

Protection Priority

Merz said his primary concern was “safety in public space” and highlighted that only when it could be ensured “will the conventional parties restore faith”.

He had drawn flak the previous week for statements that opponents claimed suggested that diversity itself was a problem in German cities: “Of course we still have this challenge in the city environment, and that is why the home affairs minister is now striving to enable and conduct deportations on a massive scale,” Merz said during a visit to the state of Brandenburg adjacent to Berlin.

Racial Prejudice Concerns

Clemens Rostock accused Merz of fueling ethnic bias with his comment, which sparked minor rallies in various cities across Germany during the weekend.

“It is harmful when ruling parties seek to portray individuals as a difficulty based on their appearance or origin,” remarked.

SPD politician Natalie Pawlik of the SPD, coalition partners in the ruling coalition, stated: “Migration cannot be labeled negatively with reductive or populist automatic responses – this divides the public even further and in the end assists the incorrect individuals rather than promoting answers.”

Political Context

The conservative leader’s CDU/CSU bloc achieved a disappointing 28.5 percent outcome in the February general election versus the anti-migrant, anti-Muslim Alternative für Deutschland with its record 20.8%.

From that point, the far right party has caught up with the conservative bloc, even overtaking it in various opinion polls, during public concerns around migration, crime and financial downturn.

Background Information

Friedrich Merz ascended to leadership of his organization promising a tougher line on migration than the longtime CDU chancellor Merkel, opposing her “wir schaffen das” catchphrase from the migrant crisis a previous decade and assigning her partial accountability for the growth of the far-right party.

He has encouraged an sometimes heightened demagogic language than his predecessor, notoriously blaming “small pashas” for repeated property damage on the year-end celebration and asylum seekers for filling up dentist appointments at the expense of German citizens.

Political Strategy

Merz’s Christian Democrats convened on the weekend to develop a plan ahead of five state elections in the coming year. the far-right party has strong leads in multiple eastern areas, flirting with a historic 40% support.

Friedrich Merz affirmed that his organization was aligned in barring partnership in administration with the Alternative für Deutschland, a stance commonly referred to as the “barrier”.

Internal Criticism

However, the recent poll data has alarmed some CDU members, causing a few of party officials and advisers to suggest in the past few weeks that the approach could be unsustainable and detrimental in the future.

The dissenters contend that while the relatively new far-right party, which internal security services have designated as far-right, is able to comment without accountability without having to make the challenging choices leadership demands, it will gain from the incumbent deficit affecting many developed countries.

Research Findings

Researchers in Germany recently found that conventional organizations such as the Christian Democrats were increasingly allowing the far right to determine priorities, unwittingly legitimising their proposals and spreading them more widely.

Although Merz resisted using the phrase “protection” on Monday, he asserted there were “fundamental differences” with the AfD which would make collaboration impossible.

“We accept this challenge,” he said. “Going forward additionally demonstrate clearly and unequivocally the AfD’s positions. We will distance ourselves distinctly and unequivocally from them. {Above all